AIWatch.

Here’s their latest apologia, as posted on X:

You can read the full report here.

Now for the reactions (the middle one is mine).

§

The careful attention to language and social responsibility award goes to the prominent and increasingly outspoken investor Bill Gurley:

Old days: “Mistakes were made”; new days “Claude did illegal things”.

§

A journalist just asked me, “I saw you mentioned Anthropic’s AI oopsie and want to know what you think about this and the OpenAI hacks as a big picture on AI and cyber?”

I think it’s bad:

The supposed leaders in AI and AI safety are clearly in over their heads. Worse, we as a society are in over our heads. From a technical perspective, this is what happens when you let pattern0matching machines with no real comprehension of what they are doing freely roam the internet. It’s everything that I have been warning about for years. From a societal perspective, it’s insane that we are pouring gasoline onto the fire by racing ahead with data centers and AI rollout when we have no idea how to control it and are just sort of hoping for the best. Unfortunately, as the saying goes, hope is not a strategy.

There’s an important footnote on the “freely roaming” the internet part, by the way. What really allowed this to happen was human error at Anthropic, in allowing the pattern-matchers to roam the internet in first place, as key passage in the report notes:

If we can’t even trust Anthropic to doublecheck their sandboxes…

§

And, finally, prize for best skewering goes to WSJ writer Joanna Stern:

P.S. Some words of advice to the AI companies from Zack Korman of Embroidery.io:

Zack Korman@ZackKorman

Dear AI labs: A good security culture means taking every incident to heart. You fell short and you need to improve. No excuses. A bad security culture is saying "if we didn't catch it, who could have? This shows how hard this is." It lets you think you're better than you are.

1:23 PM · Jul 31, 2026 · 6.3K Views

17 Replies · 26 Reposts · 204 Likes

No posts